The Party of ‘Redefiners’
Are the winds of change beginning to shift?
They say, “Great minds travel in the same circles.” It’s funny because I was formulating this article when I happened to hear a quote from Baroness Philippa Stroud (member of the House of Lords, UK, CEO of the Legatum Institute and CEO and cofounder of ARC), she said:
“So much of our story is built on the hero’s journey of overcoming obstacle and yet everything in society today is telling us conflict is not okay, (you know) challenge is not okay we've got to be safe, we've got to be (like) prevented from having challenges. Actually, it's challenge that enables the human Spirit to grow and to overcome.”
This was during an Interview hosted by Dave Rubin about an upcoming London, England conference partially instigated by Dr. Jordan Peterson. This world conference, “ARC”, will gather the brightest minds to discuss real solutions that can almost eliminate victimhood and promote health and prosperity all over the planet. These ideas will come from the people, not dictated down from the government. I’ll ask you a ‘Reagan-esque’ question. How many earth changing ideas originated from the government? And how many came from the ‘private sector’?
This fits nicely into my theme this week, concerning the Redefiners and their coming decline. What’s a ‘redefiner’? One of whom ‘redefines’. I know, I hate definitions that include the word you are asking about! Redefiners are those that choose to solve problems by changing the definitions. If that sounds crazy to you, congratulations, you are either an Independent, Conservative, or Libertarian, but probably not a Liberal. This is because the Liberal party has embraced the art of redefinition.
What exactly is this redefinition that these ‘redefiners’ are using? It is best explained as the battle between the ‘empaths’ and the ‘responsible’. Empaths ‘feel your pain’ and quite honestly revel in it! They project pain where there is none, and create victims so they can feel sorry for them. They are latching on to the final dregs of misery from generations of misused, abused, and confused minorities. This party and its aligned news media outlets (all coincidently owned/controlled by Liberal billionaire oligarchs) amplify any example of abuse, so one incident in literally a million, appears to be the next genocide.
One thing about humans is one or two of them boogers go way off the rails! That will never cease. As I gaze into my crystal ball, in the year 2525 (if man is still alive, if woman can survive…) there will be one or two damaged minds that do despicable things. If news media singles them out and gives no perspective such as there were hundreds of millions of good people that do not agree with the actions of the obviously mentally damaged soul, you could convince a large portion of empaths that this is a ‘real and present danger’!
I have referenced this before, but when a classic movie called “Jaws” was showing, throngs of people (including my very young self) were hesitant to swim in the ocean! But I was a liberal empath in those days, so cut me some slack!
The truth is about one person was killed by shark attack in about two years when that movie came out! You could probably go in while shark fins were visible and never have an encounter! But the media played up every bite story like it was a passenger airline crash! And statistically those are even way safer than driving to work in your car! Media holds the heartstrings of the empaths, and they know it. That is how they generate ratings and revenue.
This symbiotic relationship between the party of empaths and the media hungry for popularity bred the ‘redefiners’. And quickly the party of empaths adopted those redefiners. Now that is a big leap ‘Kemosabe’! (Pronounced Key-moe sah’-bee, Ref to The Lone Ranger’s sidekick, ‘Tonto’ in 50’s TV show.) Not really as big a leap as you might think.
Which party in the last few years has radically changed the definition of; ‘vaccine’?
An archived CDC web page from May 2018 shows that the agency’s previous definition of vaccine was “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease.”
The current definition on a CDC web page last updated in September 2021 reads: “A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”
The latest CDC definition is absent the word “immunity” and just focuses on the stimulation of the body’s immune response.
Why CDC changed its vaccine definition | king5.com
Which party cannot even define a ‘woman’ on the floor of Congress?
Not A Single Senate Democrat Is Willing To Define What A Woman Is | The Daily Caller
Which party has taken advantage of a growing movement of unstable souls that question their own gender?
Transgender issues sharply divide Republicans, Democrats | Pew Research Center
One answer you cannot get from Google is, “Hey Google, how many genders are there? It will change tomorrow I am sure, but today Google’s answer was:
“There are many different gender identities, including male, female, transgender, gender neutral, non-binary, agender, pangender, genderqueer, two-spirit, third gender, and ALL, NONE, or a COMBINATION of these.” (Google did not print those ALL-CAPS words, that was just me wanting to make sure you saw those. I could probably ‘rest my case’ about those redefiners now, but like the late-night TV offers, “wait, there’s more!”
The party of redefiners decided to solve the problem of overcrowding in prisons by redefining just what a criminal is and failing to prosecute bad actors for committing the crimes! Ya just can’t make this stuff up! You have lowered the population in prisons, saving billions in construction of buildings, food to feed them, and medical treatment, while turning violent criminals loose onto the streets!
From: Crime Surges as Democrats Push Return of Criminals to Streets (amac.us)
The practical result of Democrat efforts to lower or eliminate cash bail requirements has been that in many jurisdictions, criminal suspects are now released soon after they are arrested and sent back into the community with little or no financial incentive to show up in court as well as little or no financial disincentive to commit more crimes.
(back to me)
This was ingenious on the part of the party of redefiners! It created more ‘victims’! Victims of whom are prosecuted if they defend themselves against the criminal and often, even the perpetrator of the crime, if threatened or harmed, becomes the redefiners new ‘victim’!
Redefiners have even had to ‘tweak’ (lie to) AI so artificial intelligence will coincide with their ‘bizarro’ definitions. Redefiners have taken a solid conservative mantra, “Make America Great Again” and redefined it as the chant of ‘domestic terrorists’. (There were more articles but this one did not require a subscription to view)
FBI Names Trump's 'Army of MAGA Followers' As New Category of Extremists | TIMCAST
A bloc of Congress wants guns out of the hands of citizens and have redefined lawful gun owners as ‘dangerous fanatics’, again using the ‘Jaws’ technique to amplify mentally unstable actors while blaming inanimate objects and offering only empathy for their heinous deeds. But every time a mentally unstable person uses a gun the party of redefinition wants to blame the inanimate object and remove more guns which would just create more victims. Law abiding citizens use guns for protection.
Beto O'Rourke: 'Hell, yes, we're going to take your AR-15, your AK-47' | CNN Politics
When someone is stabbed to death, we don’t blame the Ginsu knife company, or stores for selling them! We don’t march in the streets protesting: ‘Knife-free kitchens Now! … Hey, hey, hear what I say, take those knives away today! … Knife-free kitchens Now!!’
The wielder of the inanimate object is brought to justice and if found mentally ill, (statistically most are), is confined and treated!
The redefiners changed the definition of ‘illegal aliens’ to immigrants when the latter used to mean ‘foreign people wishing to become American citizens (that dotted every ‘i’ and crossed every ‘t’) and was ready to roll up their sleeves and contribute to their new home’s well-being.’
Thanks to this redefinition, we now have millions with free government-issued mobile phones, being housed, fed, and medically cared for at taxpayer’s expense while they wait for their day in court (as far out now as six years due to the open border policy) and most of those millions do not qualify for ‘asylum’ as the statute is currently written!
If you get confused about the target groups the ‘party of redefinition’ goes after, just ask one question. Can they redefine them into victims? If so, BINGO!
There has even been a serious attempt to redefine the Constitution as an ‘old, outdated piece of parchment’ that can just be ignored! Even the sitting (stumbling, mumbling, and bumbling) president has proclaimed proudly while on mic, “I know this (Executive Order) is unconstitutional, but we will have another fix before it gets challenged by the Supreme Court…” (not verbatim but what I understood he was saying, and I am not far off from his words and deeds.)
The President of the United States takes a pledge before officially taking office. In the pledge he agrees to uphold the Constitution. Why is that not a serious offense when he states on air, ‘I know my Executive Order is unconstitutional, but…’? Is that ‘upholding the Constitution’??
A smarter man could deny knowing of the constitutionality, but when you brag to the nation that you know you are signing an Executive Order that you and you alone without Congress empowered? That is unconstitutional. That is pure unadulterated, prosecutable, violation of oath of office. And, if that doesn’t mean anything anymore, then the Constitution is just an outdated piece of parchment.