Do you understand the words comin’ outta my mouth!?

Let's examine a political dirty trick tactic.

Here is a quick example of how polarization can cloud the truth. This excerpt is from rwmalonemd@substack.com (of which I highly recommend you subscribe). Watch how the obvious polarization makes it appear that Dr. Robert W. Malone MD was ‘lying’. Many were easily convinced by the seemingly opposing declaration which “fact-checks” as correct, proves Dr. Malone was wrong…

Again, for emphasis, the NY State Supreme Court determined that "being vaccinated does not prevent an individual from contracting or transmitting COVID-19." - The exact same claim I made on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial on January 23, 2022, for which the Washington Post called me a liar while asserting that the CDC had demonstrated that these “vaccine” products reduced the risk of hospitalization or death from COVID-19, which endpoints I did not mention in my speech at that time.  

What I see happening all over especially in politics is this dirty trick tactic. When someone makes a statement that is correct, here Dr. Malone in January 2022 told us the ‘vaccines’ have not prevented infection or spread. This is validated by today’s New York Supreme Court.

The Washington Post called him a ‘liar’ and ‘proved’ he was, by making a seemingly opposite argument that also is true: ...the CDC had demonstrated that these “vaccine” products reduced the risk of hospitalization or death from COVID-19”.

 The two statements are both true and do not conflict with the other! Polarization adds a smokey haze over perception, it’s as if you are in the stands at a rival football game and every close call should have gone your way. Was he out of bounds when he caught that ball? If he had your team’s colors, No! And if he was wearing the visiting team’s uniform, yes!

The same applies here. The current and past ‘vaccines’ have been proven to not stop infection, even President Joe Biden of whom has professed he took the ‘vaccine’ and later caught Covid-19, twice! (so far…) And no study has shown a reduction in spread from those with or without the shot. So, this is fact.

The Washington Post should be ashamed for their glaring misrepresentation. As established journalists they had to know they were mixing apples with oranges here! The CDC has demonstrated the one positive trait attributed to the ‘vaccine’, reducing the risk of hospitalization and death in those with damaged or weakened immune systems. As Dr. Malone points out, he did not even mention that, so the accusation that he was ‘lying’ is a non sequitur!

You cannot lie by telling a truthful statement that does not even contain the challenged part within it! But even as I write this, I can see the ‘team colors’ are blurring the clarity, it’s a lie by omission, or they are tantamount to the same thing, you are just ‘splitting hairs’.

A Democrat in Congress as recent as November 8, 2023, used this tactic during the House Judiciary Committee hearing about free speech issues on college campuses. Even though there were constituents from both parties sincerely concerned about the recent outcry for deadly violence against all Jews, and the propaganda hurled at young minds by TikTok, other social media, as well as the DEI, or Diversity, Equity and Inclusion courses falling short of the ‘I’ in their name, (Inclusion) at those schools, Ms. Jayapal chose to remind us of the Charlottesville incident.

She brazenly used the dirty trick tactic of word isolation to prove a lie by using wildly out-of-context ‘quotes’. Rep. Jayapal stated, “in 2017 as they marched in Charlottesville, VA, Donald Trump said, (& he was President at the time), he said, “There were very fine people on both sides.” Then Rep. Jayapal reinforced here remark by adding, “that was an exact quote.”, and addressed Professor Nadell, “Why are Donald Trump’s words here antisemitic?” Prof. Nadell took the ball for her team and began an end-around run toward the goal line! They were antisemitic because those people that were marching in Virginia were deliberately echoing Nazi practices…

Let’s try to unwrap this dirty trick tactic used here: This one has at least two layers of deception. First, the reason for the Charlottesville demonstration (It was not a march, that word was chosen to grind against Nazi to suggest the ‘Nazis were marching!’) was to protect national monuments from being torn down and destroyed. At that time many priceless statues had been defaced, toppled, and destroyed by what was assumed to be Antifa-led groups.

A license was obtained, not for Nazis to march, but for the salvage of a threatened historical statue. This was to be a peaceful demonstration of support for historic monuments. It was peaceful until opposition (of whom obtained no permit) began dousing the protestors with spray from urine bottles and began striking them with sticks. Shortly after that a death occurred due to car-violence! Why is it that only works with gun-violence? It sounds downright silly to say “car-violence”. The driver of the car was responsible, not the car and not the hundreds of others that came to save statues!

So, the first layer of the dirty trick tactic was to label everyone there as “Nazi’s”. Were there some Nazi’s there? Actual Adolph Hitler Nazi’s? Probably not. Were there ‘skinheads’? Maybe. Were there bikers? Most assuredly. Were there peanut butter and jelly sandwich eaters? At least a few, I am certain.

Earlier I suspected the opposing group was “Antifa-led”. Did I think every one of the protesters protesting the protest were Antifa? Certainly not! You cannot label a group fairly unless they are all ‘card-carrying’ members of that group! Otherwise, you are making wild inaccurate assumptions as both Rep. Jayapal and Prof. Nadell did on the floor of Congress November 8th.

Layer two of our ‘onion’. Did Trump say, "There were very fine people on both sides."? Yes. In fact, he said, "There were very fine people on both sides… (and at about 11:40 into the video) & I'm not talking about the Neo-nazis and white supremacists because they should be condemned totally." The dirty trick tactic did not include the whole statement the President made.

(This link contains one of the few still complete copies of this press conference! The Internet is being pared down to support a single narrative.) The link should start at about 11 minutes and 40 seconds in where he addresses what Rep. Jayapal denies.

There is really a third layer to this smelly onion, in that artfully antisemitic ribbon tied around the whole group and supposedly given the kiss of approval by the then sitting President! If you are getting dizzy unwrapping onion layers, that is deliberate. That is what makes the dirty trick tactic work!

You see, if you are on the left team, it all makes total sense, and if you are on the right team, they have you feeling guilty due to so many zigs and zags, you become afraid that you too may be labeled a Nazi for just believing the truth! Oh my God! Am I a Nazi because I believe some good people came to save historical monuments, and after hearing the President’s words on the video that he was 100% accurate? The left will hammer you with “Yes, you are a Nazi!”.

But I hate Nazi’s! I support Jews! and I’m for keeping historical monuments! I could have been there in Charlottesville that dreaded day. There, but for the grace of God, go I…

Take what the other team said, change a few subtle words and regurgitate what sounds like the other team’s statement, then show how that altered testimony is not true. Watch carefully and notice when the ‘masters of misquote’ change the narrative ‘right before your eyes’, with the skills of David Copperfield or Criss Angel! If you really want to ‘understand the words comin’ outta those mouths’, don’t change them.